This article was originally published in Arab Times
The recently released Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) outline new standards for presenting investment performance to potential investors. Mr. Raghu Mandagolathur, President of CFA Kuwait, discusses these standards and why an investment firm would want to implement them.
The asset management industry in the GCC is rapidly
evolving. It is currently home to more
than 325 mutual funds with nearly $ 125 billion under management including
managed accounts. Kuwait has established
itself as a key hub within the region, and is currently home to around 65 funds
(or 20% of the total) with an estimated assets under management of $58 billion.
Kuwait also boasts the oldest stock
exchange in the region, probably the third largest in terms of market
capitalization. Consequently Kuwait continues
to develop a vibrant and growing domestic and international investment
community with the presence of nearly 100 investment companies.
If Kuwait is to continue to attract the very best investors
from both home and abroad, to evolve and grow its investment industry, we must
promote high standards of performance measurement and presentation, to help
promote better transparency, market integrity and fairness. The importance of
setting standards in performance reporting has become paramount.
But what standards should we use and how should they be
introduced? At CFA Kuwait we believe GIPS®
provide a suitable framework to help raise standards of investment management
in Kuwait and around the GCC.
What are the Global
Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®)?
GIPS are voluntary ethical standards for the calculation and
presentation of investment performance.
Their genesis dates back to the 1980s when unscrupulous investment
managers presented their best-performing portfolios to prospective clients in
hopes of winning their business.
This performance was generally not representative of the
firm’s overall investment results for that strategy. The focus of the GIPS standards, therefore,
is the presentation of performance to prospective clients who want reliable performance
metrics based on the principles of fair representation and full
disclosure.
The GIPS standards address such topics as input data,
calculation methodologies, composite construction, performance presentation,
and disclosures in both traditional and alternative asset classes. The Standards are continually evolving to
meet the needs of a dynamic industry.
Interpretations are developed and issued on an ongoing basis to assist
firms in implementing and applying the Standards.
What is a composite?
A composite is an aggregation of portfolios managed in
accordance with similar investment mandates, objectives, or strategies. All
discretionary fee-paying portfolios must be included in at least one composite,
and composite performance must be calculated and presented as the
asset-weighted average of the performance of the portfolios within the
composite. Investors are thus presented
with performance that is truly representative of a firm’s investment results
for a particular strategy.
Do the standards
apply to public equity funds and private equity funds in the same way?
Many provisions of the GIPS standards apply to both public
and private equity investments. However,
the GIPS standards also include specific requirements and recommendations for
private equity (as well as real estate).
Most private equity investments are made through limited partnerships in
which the investment manager controls the timing of capital drawdowns and
distributions. The GIPS standards
require the use of a different calculation methodology, the internal rate of
return, that reflects the timing of those cash flows.
What is new in the
2010 edition of the GIPS standards?
The recently released 2010 edition of the GIPS standards
introduces several important new concepts.
Firms will be required to value investments based on fair value rather
than market value. Although fair value
and market value are often the same for liquid securities, liquidity may dry up
at times and market values may not be available or reflective of the true value
of the investment. For investors, it is
essential to know what their investments are actually worth.
New provisions have also been added to address risk,
including a requirement for firms to present the three-year standard deviation
of composite and benchmark returns. This
is not the most sophisticated nor, for some strategies, the most appropriate
measure, but it establishes a foundation for comparability. The decision to include provisions related to
risk is a clear statement that performance includes both risk and return and
investors must evaluate both.
Although the GIPS standards are not specifically designed to
prevent fraud, the Standards require firms to present only the performance of
actual assets under management and not hypothetical or model performance. In addition to requiring firms to adhere to
all applicable laws and regulations, the Standards prohibit the presentation of
any performance information that is false and misleading. The comprehensive policies and procedures
required by the GIPS standards give investors additional comfort regarding a
firm’s infrastructure and operational controls.
How do firms
demonstrate compliance?
Firms can claim compliance once they have met all the
requirements of the Standards and prepare a compliant performance
presentation. Firms can also have an
independent verifier assess if the firm has complied with the composite
construction requirements of the GIPS standards and if the firm’s policies and
procedures are designed to calculate and present performance in compliance with
the Standards.
Why should investment
firms implement the GIPS standards?
Compliance with the GIPS standards signals to the
marketplace that a firm is committed to integrity and enhances a firm’s
credibility when competing for assets.
Because the GIPS standards are global, compliance provides firms with a
passport to compete with other firms worldwide. In addition, firms that
implement the Standards may strengthen internal controls and increase the
consistency of their performance data.
An earlier version of
this article appeared in the international edition of the Financial Times (FTfm
supplement). In addition to Mr. Mandagolathur’s
comments, Mr. Jonathan Boersma, executive
director of the Global Investment Performance Standards at CFA Institute and
Mr. Philip Lawton, CFA, CIPM, head of the CIPM program, also both contributed
to this article.
No comments:
Post a Comment