ACC
|
HDFC
|
Reliance Infra
|
ICICI
|
Infosys
|
Ambuja Cements
|
ITC
|
SBI
|
L&T
|
BPCL
|
HDFC Bank
|
M&M
|
Telco
|
BHEL
|
Sun Pharma
|
Hindalco
|
Ranbaxy
|
Tata Power
|
Cipla
|
Wipro
|
Hindustan Lever
|
Reliance
|
Tisco
|
Hero Motors
|
They all survived
the index (“Nifty”) for a decade or more. Not a small feat by any means!
How did
we arrive at this list?
Nifty, as
an index, is comprised of 50 leading stocks. But the index committee at
National Stock Exchange (NSE) do carry out periodic changes (quarterly or more)
whereby stocks are excluded and included based on a variety of criteria
including financial performance, liquidity, etc. Since 1996 when the Nifty was
constituted, nearly 100 companies have participated in this ritual of getting
in and getting out. While 49 companies have survived the Nifty (out of which 24
survived for 10 or more years), 53 companies got axed out at some stage or
other due to various reasons including poor performance, mergers, delisting, liquidity,
etc. Out of the 24 companies that survived for 10 or more years, 17 of them
survived since the formation of the index i.e., for 16 years! (the grey shaded
companies in the box above)
From the
current list of the index, we backtracked it based on the data provided in the
NSE website about inclusions and exclusions. Here is a visual description of
this in and out process.
Why is
it important?
Getting
included in the index is considered a feather in the cap for a company. Well
governed companies work for such accreditation since inclusion attracts
institutional investors (domestic and foreign) and improves the liquidity and
profile for the stock. More important than the inclusion is the ability to stay
put in the index without being axed. Surviving the nifty becomes important in
that context since companies should continuously qualify under various
parameters to be part of the index.
How is
their performance?
The
“survivors” averaged an annualized return of 18% during these long years of
stay in the Nifty compared to Nifty’s 12% annualized return. Sun Pharma topped
the list with a 35% annualized return followed by Infosys (34%) and HDFC Bank
(33%) (see the risk-return chart). The lowest in the pack was Hindalco at
5%. They all enjoyed good daily
liquidity and have consistently produced excellent top line and bottom line
growth. We also can notice other companies in the survivor list that survived
for less than 10 years and is still going strong. They average a return of 12%
again with good liquidity. As they season and age (like the survivors), they
may pick up in performance and out beat the Nifty index.
The power
of compounding is so astounding that an investment of Rs.10,000 back in 1996 in
say HDFC Bank would now be worth Rs. 10 lakhs while the same invested in Nifty
index will be worth only Rs.61,222 and worse, Hindalco worth only about
Rs.21,808. However, this is not to suggest investing only in one or two
companies as it takes away the benefit of diversification.
The
“non-survivors” (totaling 53 companies) averaged an annualized return of -3%
with liquidity just one third of survivors. Their average staying period in the
Nifty index was less than 6 years ranging from 2 years on the bottom (Jet Airways,
Andhra Valley, etc) to 14 years (ABB).
So what
should be the portfolio strategy?
The key
here is to monitor a company’s ability to survive Nifty for say a good period
(10 years!) whereupon it becomes a candidate for inclusion in one’s portfolio
till the time it is evicted out of Nifty for one reason or other. All the 17 stocks that survived the Nifty
till date will qualify for portfolio inclusion after a waiting period of 10
years. In other words, Since Nifty was formed in 1996, that testing period of
ten years would end in 2005 when these stocks will be natural inclusions. A
quick check of the performance of these hardcore survivors post portfolio
inclusion (i.e, 2005) show that the performance is mostly superior to the naïve
nifty investment. The only work here is to monitor the quarterly
inclusion/exclusion exercise of the NSE which I feel is not that big a deal.
Company
|
Year of
inclusion in the portfolio
|
Purchase
price
|
Sale price
|
CAGR (2005-2012)
|
HDFC Bank
|
2005
|
123.9
|
558.8
|
24%
|
M&M
|
2005
|
164.5
|
736.7
|
24%
|
I T C
|
2005
|
55.9
|
245.3
|
24%
|
L&T
|
2005
|
318.5
|
1337.1
|
23%
|
HDFC
|
2005
|
180.7
|
697.9
|
21%
|
ACC
|
2005
|
424
|
1298.7
|
17%
|
RIL
|
2005
|
253.7
|
769.4
|
17%
|
SBI
|
2005
|
717.6
|
2093.5
|
17%
|
HUL
|
2005
|
161.2
|
454.4
|
16%
|
Tata Motors
|
2005
|
94
|
256.7
|
15%
|
Ambuja
|
2005
|
65.5
|
174
|
15%
|
Tata Power
|
2005
|
40.5
|
103.1
|
14%
|
Nifty
|
2005
|
2297.1
|
5314.2
|
13%
|
ICICI Bank
|
2005
|
463
|
909.6
|
10%
|
Tata Steel
|
2005
|
331.8
|
431.2
|
4%
|
Hindalco
|
2005
|
111.4
|
124.3
|
2%
|
Ranbaxy
|
2005
|
473.2
|
493
|
1%
|
Rel infra
|
2005
|
562
|
525.4
|
-1%
|
The author
thanks Ms. Sowmya Dorai for data analysis.
No comments:
Post a Comment