Market pundits suggest
we are entering into an era of the “new normal” characterized by low returns
and high volatility on risky assets. Following an earlier article in the
Financial Times (FTfm supplement) Stephen Horan, head of professional
education content and private wealth management at CFA Institute and Raghu Mandagolathur of CFA Kuwait, the
national Kuwait society, discuss how the financial crisis has encouraged new
thinking about what it means for markets to be abnormal and how to measure
it. The GCC stock markets measure very
high in terms of volatility, even higher than emerging markets. The high
volatility contributes to excessive speculation which reduces market
efficiency. The issue is exacerbated by index concentration with few large cap stocks
dominating the index. While decline in volatility happens over a long period of
time when markets become more efficient, investors would do well to understand
its source and take measures to manage it.
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->Why is it important to measure market volatility?
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->Why is it important to measure market volatility?
Volatility has implications for the future market behavior. Research shows that abnormally large price
movements (whether positive or negative) tend to be followed by relatively high
returns. Investors gain confidence as
markets gradually resolve uncertainty instigated by the initial price
shock.
How do portfolio
managers typically measure market volatility?
Returns that are one standard deviation away from average
are more typical than returns three standard deviations away from average. Whether based on historical experience or
implied by option prices, an asset’s standard deviation provides a benchmark
for normal, or typical, variation relative to itself.
Are we in an
abnormally volatile era?
The EURO STOXX 50 Volatility index, which measures the
forward-looking standard deviation implied by prices of EURO STOXX 50 index
options, has been close to its 52-week low, suggesting that market participants
anticipate relative tranquility in the near term. Based on this measure, one might say we are
in an era of abnormally low volatility.
All else equal, markets respond negatively when implied volatility
increases.
Are there other ways
to measure market volatility?
One could think about the variability of returns among
individual stocks in an index rather than the variability of broad market index
relative to itself. The more disperse
the returns among a group of securities, the greater the opportunity for
profitable security selection within that group. This volatility across securities tends to
spike in times of crisis, suggesting that returns from active management can be
most pronounced during these times.
In a more eclectic vein, market volatility can be measured
using linguistics to quantify the volume, tenor, and variability of sentiment
of newswire stories. This
non-traditional, forward-looking approach can be helpful when forward-looking implied
volatilities from option contracts are unavailable.
Finally, volatility can be measured in terms of how asset
classes typically behave in relation to one another, sometimes called market
turbulence.
What do you mean by
“turbulence”?
For example, in relatively tranquil markets, returns on
corporate bonds and large company stocks are normally fairly independent of
each other. In turbulent markets, the
returns of these asset classes may tend to move together.
Even if return variability of corporate bonds or large company stocks is not particularly abnormal based on their individual behavior, the market can be turbulent based on the uncharacteristically high correlation between the two asset classes. Mark Kritzman, CFA, and Yuanzhen Li propose a method measuring turbulence that incorporates unusual correlations in a recent Financial Analysts Journal article.
Are you simply describing
the notion that correlations increase in times of crisis?
The concept has broader applicability. In some cases, correlations decrease in
turbulent markets. For example, returns
on high-yield corporate bonds and high-quality government bonds tend to be
highly correlated in normal markets when returns on fixed income instruments
are dominated by interest rate movements.
In times of stress, changes in the risk premium dominate
price changes, driving down returns on high-yield bonds and pushing up returns
on high-quality government bonds in a flight to safety. The main point is that turbulence is defined
as much by abnormal correlation of returns as it is by abnormal volatility.
How might portfolio
managers integrate different notion of volatility into practice?
First, portfolio managers can use the variability of returns
across different securities to judge the profit potential of active management
in a particular asset class and adjust their active or passive strategy weights
accordingly.
Portfolio managers might also spend extra time conducting
scenario analyses based on experiences in market crises and focusing on
variables that have been historically unstable.
Finally, they can incorporate covariances and other parameters derived
from turbulent market periods rather than normally tranquil markets to
construct portfolios.
No comments:
Post a Comment